Wednesday, October 31, 2012

Let Housing Lead the Recovery!!! RE/MAX's Dave Liniger Makes a House Call(ing) Out To Obama and Romney

Recently, Dave Liniger, co-founder and chairman of RE/MAX, LLC, had some choice words for the presidential candidates regarding their stances—or lack thereof—on the nation’s housing crisis.

In an open letter (posted at the bottom) addressing both President Obama and Governor Romney, Liniger calls out the two candidates for avoiding the issue when it comes to the current state of affairs in American housing. Liniger points out that the two nominees are focusing all their energy and resources on the economy at large and chides them because “as leaders, you ignore housing at our peril,” he says.

Liniger writes, “Although the economy is recognized as the single most important issue in the campaign, and housing is commonly blamed for the recession and sluggish recovery, it is unimaginable that relevant solutions to housing issues have not been front and center.”

Liniger says housing has the ability to promote a stronger overall economic recovery “if it is allowed to do so.” He says “it will take real political leadership in the White House and Congress to acknowledge this fact.”

He goes on to point out that while there have been positive shifts in market movement recently, the housing industry is still far from being out of danger. Liniger backs up his statement by breaking down four basic, yet significant, obstacles he sees as blocking the road to recovery for housing, and ultimately the economy.

First, Liniger believes the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act must be extended. Initially approved in 2007, this act is set to expire on December 31, barring any action to preserve it. Without an extension, Liniger projects a possible reduction in the nation’s home sales by an immediate 20 percent.

“The CB0 [Congressional Budget Office] says a two-year extension will save distressed families about $2 billion,” Liniger notes, adding that troubled homeowners who qualify for a loan modification or short sale are not likely to pursue either of these options if the act expires, making their remaining mortgage balance taxable income.

Second, Liniger lobbies for reasonable lending standards to be established. In response to the crisis, lenders have enforced strict lending requirements in order to cover their own interests, but Liniger argues the pendulum has swung too far in the direction of conservatism, to the point that even those individuals with good credit face difficulty obtaining a loan. This schism only further halts the movement of real estate.

Financing appears to be getting more difficult to secure, not less, according to Liniger. “In August, the average FICO score of a rejected mortgage application at Fannie and Freddie was 734, two points higher than one year ago,” he writes.

Related to these financing difficulties is Liniger’s third point—housing-specific provisions of the Dodd-Frank Consumer Protection Act, more specifically, defining a “qualified mortgage” as directed by the act. Liniger says if regulators craft an unreasonable definition, it will become even harder to obtain a mortgage and potentially add to financing costs. “Even the authors of this legislation have said this was not their intent,” he writes.

Liniger describes the fourth obstacle as one that “really shocks most of us in real estate,” and that’s reducing or eliminating the mortgage interest deduction. Regarded by some as merely a loophole for the wealthy, Liniger urgently ushers in the opinion that “this is the wrong approach at the wrong time,” and “even a gradual elimination gives pause to many potential homeowners.”
While Liniger gives the readers of his letter much to think about and discuss, perhaps his most telling statement is a bold order that leaves little room for interpretation. Simply stated, he commands the candidates to “first, do no harm.” His message is clear and concise, calling for a “less is more” mentality in regards to correction and forced action.

Imploring the candidates to consider the repercussions of their policy choices, Liniger asks of whomever is elected, “Do not disrupt the ability of a fragile housing market to positively impact a stalled economic recovery at this critical time.” He goes on to assure Obama and Romney that “Housing is a powerful economic engine that can easily add a large number of jobs and cash to the overall economy if not prevented from doing so.”

We want to know what you think, so please comment!!!!!!   

Here is the full letter:

To President Obama and Governor Romney:

We have just witnessed the last of three presidential debates in anticipation of elections now just 2 weeks away. Considering the depth of these debates and the months of political advertisements in this campaign, it is discouraging that there has not been a serious discussion about housing. As leaders, you ignore housing at our peril.

Although the economy is recognized as the single most important issue in this campaign, and housing is commonly blamed for the recession and sluggish recovery, it is unimaginable that relevant solutions to housing issues have not been front and center. Over 3.5 million homes have been foreclosed on in the last four years, another 3 million are likely in the next four, one in 213 homes had a foreclosure filing in the third quarter, and over 10.8 million homes remain underwater with mortgages greater than their market value.

Housing has always led the country out of the dark days of recession, but that has not happened this time. Still, housing does have the ability to promote a stronger overall recovery if it is allowed to do so. But it will take real political leadership in the White House and Congress to acknowledge this fact and take the appropriate steps.

It has been a long and painful road for homeowners and real estate professionals alike, but market performance in recent months has everyone feeling a bit more optimistic. Prices are rising and many underwater homeowners have received a lifeline. But we’re not on solid ground just yet. Significant obstacles remain on the road to recovery.

Simple steps would quickly increase home sales by another 700,000, create over a quarter of a million jobs and deposit millions of dollars into the economy. So, what are the obstacles?

One aspect of the fiscal cliff you have not discussed is the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007, which is set to expire on December 31. If not extended, this has the potential of immediately reducing home sales by as much as 20%. Troubled homeowners who meet the qualifications for a loan modification or short sale are not likely to pursue either of these options if the remaining mortgage balance is considered taxable income.

Many of us in real estate have long been promoting the short sale as a viable alternative to foreclosure. In 2012, short sales began to shed their reputation as a cumbersome and time-consuming process, and their numbers have been steadily increasing. This helped reduce foreclosures and kick-start a struggling housing market. Now, the transaction that serves as salvation for many families facing foreclosure will come to an abrupt halt.

The CBO says a two-year extension will save distressed families about $2 billion. The average debt forgiveness in a short sale is $65,000. How are these struggling families going to pay taxes on this amount? Without debt relief they will eventually be forced into bankruptcy or foreclosure. What will the associated costs to society be then?

In normal times, most of us would never consider forgiving unpaid tax bills, but these are not normal times. It is more important for our country to get housing on a solid footing, put people back to work and have an economy that everyone can be confident in again. Just like a debt relief policy that is more appropriate to another place and time, unrealistic lending standards are also slowing the recovery.

Even with improving home sales, nearly 15% of sales contracts are falling through. This is largely the result of strict lending requirements. Obviously, we’re obsessed with fighting the last war. Today’s lending requirements may have prevented the housing crisis five years ago, but the pendulum has swung too far in the opposite direction. Otherwise creditworthy individuals are being denied or too intimidated to apply for a home loan.

Financing appears to be getting more difficult, not less. In August, the average FICO score of a rejected mortgage application at Fannie and Freddie was 734, two points higher than one year ago. And the average down payment of a rejected applicant was 19%. Historically, these are numbers that would seem like a solid lending risk, but for some reason that’s not the case today.

Additionally, requirements in the Dodd-Frank Consumer Protection Act that would unreasonably define Qualified Mortgages will certainly have the unintended consequences of making mortgages more difficult to obtain and perhaps add to the cost of financing a home. Even the authors of this legislation have said this was not their intent.

One proposal being considered that really shocks most of us in real estate is the elimination or reduction of the Mortgage Interest Deduction. This is not simply a loophole for the wealthy. It has been a mainstay of the middle class for many years, and by promoting homeownership it promotes a strong economy. Over 75% of homeowners utilize the deduction over the time of their ownership. Even a gradual elimination gives pause to many potential homeowners. This is the wrong approach at the wrong time.

Our message to you is simple, "first, do no harm." Do not disrupt the ability of a fragile housing market to positively impact a stalled economic recovery at this critical time. Housing is a powerful economic engine that can easily add a large number of jobs and cash to the overall economy if it is not prevented from doing so.

The Debt Relief Act must be extended, reasonable lending standards established, housing-specific provisions of Dodd-Frank re-examined, and the mortgage interest deduction untouched. These steps will build a solid foundation, restore confidence, and provide clarity to lenders and relief to troubled homeowners. Take these simple steps and watch housing lead the country to real recovery, as it has many times in the past.

President Obama and Governor Romney, you still have time to detail your vision. For many Americans, housing is still a crisis and they are anxiously waiting for solutions.

Respectfully,

Dave Liniger

Co-Founder and Chairman

RE/MAX, LLC


Author Bio: Rob Alley earned a bachelors degree at Virginia Tech, in Blacksburg, VA in Biology. Rob Alley consults with homeowners regarding Real Estate transactions and speciliazes in listing and selling Charlottesville Real Estate. Realtor/Owner of Virginia Real Estate Solutions at RE/MAX Assured Properties
Charlottesville Real Estate Experts
Share on Facebook
Virginia Real Estate Solutions

Promote Your Page Too

1 comment:

  1. Great Post! It's very nice to read this info from someone that actually knows what they are talking about. REO notes for Sale

    ReplyDelete